<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Country Blocks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.countryipblocks.net/country-blocks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.countryipblocks.net</link>
	<description>Security Solutions With Searchable IP Block Database</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 02:24:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd K</title>
		<link>http://www.countryipblocks.net/country-blocks/comment-page-1/#comment-1949</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryipblocks.net/?page_id=4#comment-1949</guid>
		<description>Hi Stewart,

I have a zip file for you guys to check out as requested.  You can download it from the following URL.

&lt;code&gt;URL HIDDEN&lt;/code&gt;

For now I would appreciate if the URL wasn&#039;t posted yet.  I&#039;m working on a signup/download section for the host site.  From there I&#039;ll make it generally available to the open public.

The version in the zip is time-bombed and dies in March.  It only supports blocking 5 countries at a time right now.  This isn&#039;t due to performance issues or anything, I&#039;m just hoping to keep the full version under wraps until everything is ready to go.  I&#039;ve had a full version running on my machine for the past 3 or 4 weeks with 129 countries (some 24,000 firewall entries) blocked with no performance impact whatsoever on my machine, so I&#039;m feeling really confident it will work well for people.

If you could give it a shot and let me know what you think I would appreciate it.  If you would like to try out a fully functional version as well I can put a build together for you guys.  Just give me an email or something and I can send it your way.

Todd K</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stewart,</p>
<p>I have a zip file for you guys to check out as requested.  You can download it from the following URL.</p>
<p><code>URL HIDDEN</code></p>
<p>For now I would appreciate if the URL wasn&#8217;t posted yet.  I&#8217;m working on a signup/download section for the host site.  From there I&#8217;ll make it generally available to the open public.</p>
<p>The version in the zip is time-bombed and dies in March.  It only supports blocking 5 countries at a time right now.  This isn&#8217;t due to performance issues or anything, I&#8217;m just hoping to keep the full version under wraps until everything is ready to go.  I&#8217;ve had a full version running on my machine for the past 3 or 4 weeks with 129 countries (some 24,000 firewall entries) blocked with no performance impact whatsoever on my machine, so I&#8217;m feeling really confident it will work well for people.</p>
<p>If you could give it a shot and let me know what you think I would appreciate it.  If you would like to try out a fully functional version as well I can put a build together for you guys.  Just give me an email or something and I can send it your way.</p>
<p>Todd K</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart White</title>
		<link>http://www.countryipblocks.net/country-blocks/comment-page-1/#comment-1841</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 12:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryipblocks.net/?page_id=4#comment-1841</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1840&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Todd K&lt;/a&gt; 
Send us a link to a zip file and we&#039;ll take a look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1840" rel="nofollow">@Todd K</a><br />
Send us a link to a zip file and we&#8217;ll take a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd K</title>
		<link>http://www.countryipblocks.net/country-blocks/comment-page-1/#comment-1840</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 04:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryipblocks.net/?page_id=4#comment-1840</guid>
		<description>Progress goes well.  I have an Alpha version running on my server right now.  Stewart, if you guys are interested I would be happy to send you a copy to review/try.  I would prefer to get a thumbs up from you guys before I share it with anyone else.  Currently I have it caching your data by region on a weekly basis.  I have some 26,000 CIDR entries saved into Windows Firewall at this time with no noticeable performance impact so far.  I&#039;ve gone as far as loading nearly every country (except my own) into the firewall and noticed little performance change with that.  There are a number of features I still want to add, but I&#039;m very close to having it beta-ready.  Ideally I would want to get a handful of beta testers in place to try it out prior to any general release.  I am additionally working on a website for it.  I&#039;ll let you know when I have that ready.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Progress goes well.  I have an Alpha version running on my server right now.  Stewart, if you guys are interested I would be happy to send you a copy to review/try.  I would prefer to get a thumbs up from you guys before I share it with anyone else.  Currently I have it caching your data by region on a weekly basis.  I have some 26,000 CIDR entries saved into Windows Firewall at this time with no noticeable performance impact so far.  I&#8217;ve gone as far as loading nearly every country (except my own) into the firewall and noticed little performance change with that.  There are a number of features I still want to add, but I&#8217;m very close to having it beta-ready.  Ideally I would want to get a handful of beta testers in place to try it out prior to any general release.  I am additionally working on a website for it.  I&#8217;ll let you know when I have that ready.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart White</title>
		<link>http://www.countryipblocks.net/country-blocks/comment-page-1/#comment-1817</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 19:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryipblocks.net/?page_id=4#comment-1817</guid>
		<description>Globally there are about 107,000 networks allocated to countries; With the currently allocated countries and bogons this is approximately 4 billion address. A little over 200 million are unallocated.

If you are building an Access Control List, (whitelist/blacklist) you are going to ease the load on your resources if you use entire networks as opposed to breaking it out by IP address.

The United States has 1.5 billion addresses, but these are contained within approximately 39,000 upper level network ranges (prior to being subdivided further).

Building an aggregated list is a little bit difficult because the networks assigned to countries are neither contiguous nor continuous. Due to the many projects we are working on we are not currently offering an aggregation script. But these scripts do exist. You&#039;ll find a link to one here: &lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-836&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-836&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Richard Sandoz&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;
Not sure if this is of any help:
Will merge a list of CIDR networks and consolidate adjacencies and overlaps:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.richardsandoz.com/perl/cidrmerge.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.richardsandoz.com/perl/cidrmerge.html&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Let me know what countries you would like on your whitelist and the format you would like your data to appear, and I&#039;ll create if for you (if it&#039;s reasonable).

&lt;strong&gt;Incidentally, if anyone would like to donate an aggregation script to Country IP Blocks, I will see about getting it incorporated into the website.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Globally there are about 107,000 networks allocated to countries; With the currently allocated countries and bogons this is approximately 4 billion address. A little over 200 million are unallocated.</p>
<p>If you are building an Access Control List, (whitelist/blacklist) you are going to ease the load on your resources if you use entire networks as opposed to breaking it out by IP address.</p>
<p>The United States has 1.5 billion addresses, but these are contained within approximately 39,000 upper level network ranges (prior to being subdivided further).</p>
<p>Building an aggregated list is a little bit difficult because the networks assigned to countries are neither contiguous nor continuous. Due to the many projects we are working on we are not currently offering an aggregation script. But these scripts do exist. You&#8217;ll find a link to one here:<br />
<blockquote cite="#commentbody-836">
<strong><a href="#comment-836" rel="nofollow">Richard Sandoz</a> :</strong><br />
Not sure if this is of any help:<br />
Will merge a list of CIDR networks and consolidate adjacencies and overlaps:<br />
<a href="http://www.richardsandoz.com/perl/cidrmerge.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.richardsandoz.com/perl/cidrmerge.html</a>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Let me know what countries you would like on your whitelist and the format you would like your data to appear, and I&#8217;ll create if for you (if it&#8217;s reasonable).</p>
<p><strong>Incidentally, if anyone would like to donate an aggregation script to Country IP Blocks, I will see about getting it incorporated into the website.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whitelist Admin</title>
		<link>http://www.countryipblocks.net/country-blocks/comment-page-1/#comment-1815</link>
		<dc:creator>Whitelist Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 19:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryipblocks.net/?page_id=4#comment-1815</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-806&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-806&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Stewart White &lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;We offer information on all active, reserved or allocated global IPv4 addresses. Currently, of the 4,294,967,296 possible IPv4 addresses, 3,977,143,746 are active, reserved or allocated. These addresses are contained in nearly 105,000 separate networks.
As of April 12, 2010, The USA has 37,767 networks and 1,490,138,622 subnets. Canada includes 5,758 networks and 76,999,932 subnets.
From a security standpoint it is usually better to decide what you will ALLOW onto your network instead of what you want to DENY. But, in weighing whether to set up a rule set to implicitly ALLOW or DENY, you should consider factors such as efficiency, size of the ruleset, overhead, available system memory, CPU, etc.
For example, if you wanted to deny traffic from China, you could create a ruleset to ALLOW the rest of the world, which would by default deny China. Or you could create a ruleset to expressly DENY China, which would by default allow any network that is not part of the IP blocks assigned to China. The resources required for the latter are much less than the former.
At the current time it would require significantly less resources to ALLOW the USA and Canada and deny the rest of the globe than it would to DENY access to every country except the USA and Canada. The difference is in how the rule is written and the amount of data required to properly process the rule.
In any case, you need to approach your decision thoughtfully. Any changes you make to a firewall or .htaccess file will impact resource utilization.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Stewart- I have been following some of your comments, as well as those by Paul and ToddK. I am trying to build a whitelist of the entire world minutes a couple countries.   To your post, there are about 1.5M ranges in the US alone.  Instead of building a listing of millions or ranges, do you know how I could build a [hopefully aggregated] whitelist based on inputting those locations I want to deny?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-806"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-806" rel="nofollow">Stewart White </a> :</strong>We offer information on all active, reserved or allocated global IPv4 addresses. Currently, of the 4,294,967,296 possible IPv4 addresses, 3,977,143,746 are active, reserved or allocated. These addresses are contained in nearly 105,000 separate networks.<br />
As of April 12, 2010, The USA has 37,767 networks and 1,490,138,622 subnets. Canada includes 5,758 networks and 76,999,932 subnets.<br />
From a security standpoint it is usually better to decide what you will ALLOW onto your network instead of what you want to DENY. But, in weighing whether to set up a rule set to implicitly ALLOW or DENY, you should consider factors such as efficiency, size of the ruleset, overhead, available system memory, CPU, etc.<br />
For example, if you wanted to deny traffic from China, you could create a ruleset to ALLOW the rest of the world, which would by default deny China. Or you could create a ruleset to expressly DENY China, which would by default allow any network that is not part of the IP blocks assigned to China. The resources required for the latter are much less than the former.<br />
At the current time it would require significantly less resources to ALLOW the USA and Canada and deny the rest of the globe than it would to DENY access to every country except the USA and Canada. The difference is in how the rule is written and the amount of data required to properly process the rule.<br />
In any case, you need to approach your decision thoughtfully. Any changes you make to a firewall or .htaccess file will impact resource utilization.</p></blockquote>
<p>Stewart- I have been following some of your comments, as well as those by Paul and ToddK. I am trying to build a whitelist of the entire world minutes a couple countries.   To your post, there are about 1.5M ranges in the US alone.  Instead of building a listing of millions or ranges, do you know how I could build a [hopefully aggregated] whitelist based on inputting those locations I want to deny?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whitelist Admin</title>
		<link>http://www.countryipblocks.net/country-blocks/comment-page-1/#comment-1814</link>
		<dc:creator>Whitelist Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 19:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryipblocks.net/?page_id=4#comment-1814</guid>
		<description>Todd K I just saw your comments, and will follow your progress.

&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1813&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Whitelist Admin &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd K I just saw your comments, and will follow your progress.</p>
<p><a href="#comment-1813" rel="nofollow">@Whitelist Admin </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whitelist Admin</title>
		<link>http://www.countryipblocks.net/country-blocks/comment-page-1/#comment-1813</link>
		<dc:creator>Whitelist Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 19:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryipblocks.net/?page_id=4#comment-1813</guid>
		<description>I am trying to exlude any user located in certain countries from being able to access one of my systems, but using a whitelist since I can not backlist in this case. 

Does anyone have an easy way that I can drop in the ranges from these countries I don&#039;t want to connect, to build a whitelist allowing everything else? If I just go country by country and add each and everyone alloweable range the list would be millions. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to exlude any user located in certain countries from being able to access one of my systems, but using a whitelist since I can not backlist in this case. </p>
<p>Does anyone have an easy way that I can drop in the ranges from these countries I don&#8217;t want to connect, to build a whitelist allowing everything else? If I just go country by country and add each and everyone alloweable range the list would be millions. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sys_Admin</title>
		<link>http://www.countryipblocks.net/country-blocks/comment-page-1/#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator>Sys_Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 23:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryipblocks.net/?page_id=4#comment-1757</guid>
		<description>I have built a new iptables list from this site, I can see hits already from China/Russia/India and other rouge countries who attack and perform denial of service attacks. Now all of their connections/data go to /dev/null.

:)
GREAT SITE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have built a new iptables list from this site, I can see hits already from China/Russia/India and other rouge countries who attack and perform denial of service attacks. Now all of their connections/data go to /dev/null.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.countryipblocks.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
GREAT SITE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart White</title>
		<link>http://www.countryipblocks.net/country-blocks/comment-page-1/#comment-1752</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 12:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryipblocks.net/?page_id=4#comment-1752</guid>
		<description>IPv6 will work the same as IPv4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IPv6 will work the same as IPv4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keichi Minamoto</title>
		<link>http://www.countryipblocks.net/country-blocks/comment-page-1/#comment-1751</link>
		<dc:creator>Keichi Minamoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 12:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryipblocks.net/?page_id=4#comment-1751</guid>
		<description>Congratulations.
Excellent and really precise website.
Goes right now to my delicio.us. I was looking for something like this.

Just a question, what about IPv6? 
Will it work the same way as IPv4?

Thanks once again and keep up the great job! ^_^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations.<br />
Excellent and really precise website.<br />
Goes right now to my delicio.us. I was looking for something like this.</p>
<p>Just a question, what about IPv6?<br />
Will it work the same way as IPv4?</p>
<p>Thanks once again and keep up the great job! ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart White</title>
		<link>http://www.countryipblocks.net/country-blocks/comment-page-1/#comment-1744</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 14:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryipblocks.net/?page_id=4#comment-1744</guid>
		<description>Your tool is similar to something we are working on. Not graphically, but conceptually. Good luck with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your tool is similar to something we are working on. Not graphically, but conceptually. Good luck with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd K</title>
		<link>http://www.countryipblocks.net/country-blocks/comment-page-1/#comment-1740</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 23:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryipblocks.net/?page_id=4#comment-1740</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a quick screen shot of the interface I&#039;m working on.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/57715420@N05/5314097612/

The interface is just a nice way of selecting the continents/countries you want to block out.  The guts of it will take the cidr entries and apply them to Windows Firewall.  What I found on my server is that not only is the web service getting attacked, but people are trying to get access to it any way they can (web service, email server, windows credentials, etc.)  The intent here is just to block everything from regions that are irrelevant to the sites that I&#039;m hosting.  If they can&#039;t see it hopefully they&#039;ll just leave it alone.  I began with the lists on okean.com, but I like that your info is more complete.  

It&#039;s early days, but I&#039;m thinking export/import of settings so that you set up one server and copy the settings to other web servers.  I already have a smallish app that runs on a weekly basis and updates the firewall (using okean lists).  I just need to modify that to pull from a better source and apply as per the settings from the app.  I can probably just cache the data on my server and encrypt it so that I know it&#039;s only my tool using it.  That way I won&#039;t be burdening you guys if people like the tool and start using it a lot.

I&#039;m certainly open to suggestions as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a quick screen shot of the interface I&#8217;m working on.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/57715420@N05/5314097612/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/57715420@N05/5314097612/</a></p>
<p>The interface is just a nice way of selecting the continents/countries you want to block out.  The guts of it will take the cidr entries and apply them to Windows Firewall.  What I found on my server is that not only is the web service getting attacked, but people are trying to get access to it any way they can (web service, email server, windows credentials, etc.)  The intent here is just to block everything from regions that are irrelevant to the sites that I&#8217;m hosting.  If they can&#8217;t see it hopefully they&#8217;ll just leave it alone.  I began with the lists on okean.com, but I like that your info is more complete.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s early days, but I&#8217;m thinking export/import of settings so that you set up one server and copy the settings to other web servers.  I already have a smallish app that runs on a weekly basis and updates the firewall (using okean lists).  I just need to modify that to pull from a better source and apply as per the settings from the app.  I can probably just cache the data on my server and encrypt it so that I know it&#8217;s only my tool using it.  That way I won&#8217;t be burdening you guys if people like the tool and start using it a lot.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m certainly open to suggestions as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart White</title>
		<link>http://www.countryipblocks.net/country-blocks/comment-page-1/#comment-1739</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 22:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryipblocks.net/?page_id=4#comment-1739</guid>
		<description>Your access has been restored. Please let us know more about your project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your access has been restored. Please let us know more about your project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd K</title>
		<link>http://www.countryipblocks.net/country-blocks/comment-page-1/#comment-1738</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 22:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryipblocks.net/?page_id=4#comment-1738</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not planning on redistributing the data at all, just providing a means of applying that data at the firewall level instead of just the web service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not planning on redistributing the data at all, just providing a means of applying that data at the firewall level instead of just the web service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart White</title>
		<link>http://www.countryipblocks.net/country-blocks/comment-page-1/#comment-1737</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 22:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryipblocks.net/?page_id=4#comment-1737</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1458&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@JWSmythe&lt;/a&gt; 
JW:

Please provide us with a little more info on your project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1458" rel="nofollow">@JWSmythe</a><br />
JW:</p>
<p>Please provide us with a little more info on your project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

